DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 2217-13
17 April 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 November 2013. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material consisted of your application,
together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 29 May 1984.
On 5 April 1985 you received nonjudicial punishment for an
unauthorized absence of ten days.
On 16 January 1986 a special court-martial convened and found
you guilty of six periods of unauthorized absence totaling 156
days, missing movement, and sentenced you to confinement at hard
labor for 75 days, forfeiture of pay of $426.00 per month for
three months, and a bad conduct discharge (BCD). You were
separated with a BCD on 14 September 1987.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
overall record of service. The Board concluded that these
factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
service, given the serious and repeated nature of your
misconduct, which ultimately resulted in your discharge.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request,
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannet be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
ieee: ore
ROBERT D.
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07851-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 22 December 1967 you were convicted by a fourth SPCM for a 21-day period of unauthorized absence and escaping confinement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01565-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. the suspended BCD was ordered executed because of your continued misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07775-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2008. all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 09131 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1 S$. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 September 2013. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10971-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your three NUJP’s and SPCM conviction for periods of UA totaling over four years. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00676-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was ~ insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. were convicted by summary court martial (SCM) of instances of disobedience of a superior officer and sentenced to fifteen days of confinement at hard labor and a forfeiture of pay. I July~l963...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04755-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2010. Nevertheless, these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the seriousness of your misconduct and your lengthy periods of UA from the Marine Corps which resulted in three NJPs and a SPCM. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the’ applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02770-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. April 1945 you received CM on two occasions for missing muster, On 22 March 1945 the DD was mitigated to a bad conduct On 3 February 1945 the confinement You were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02255-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 19 January 1978, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for a brief period of unauthorized absence and were awarded a forfeiture of pay, restriction, and extra duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10980-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your three NUP’s, SCM, and especially your SPCM conviction for very serious misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...